Press Statement by Teoh Lee Lan
(The Sister of The Late Teoh Beng Hock)
18-1-2012
 It’s already 2012, could the PM please tell us when the Beng Hock case will be given due attention?
We, the family of Teoh Beng Hock, will be in Putrajaya at 9 a.m., 2 February 2012 for a Court of Appeal decision on the Teoh Beng Hock case judicial review.
In 2012 we are about to usher in the third Chinese New Year without Beng Hock and with the truth nowhere in sight.
We should like to ask: What actually happened on 16 July 2009 at the scene of Beng Hock’s death? Why have the various doubts we raised gone unanswered? For the past few years, we have asked such questions not once, not twice, but more than a thousand times at the courts, in the media, and at various forums, but every time silence was the answer. At this festival, when families are supposed to have reunions and everyone get together for celebration, we still have to be faced with these questions that frustrated us for thousands of times. The heavy clouds of doubt and specious “presuppositional” answers did not in any way help to give a true picture of what happened on the day of the incident except for throwing the truth into an even more dubious haze. Some would say, hasn’t a coroner’s court examined the case? Wasn’t a Royal Commission of Inquiry already set up? Hasn’t a report come out? It is true that all this the government has done. But do we have any idea who the people most responsible are? Have we heard any agency publicly give any hint of regret? Have we seen the suspects investigated? Have our doubts and suspicions been cleared up? Has the truth come to our knowledge?
Read more
KUALA LUMPUR, 27 Okt — Keluarga Teoh Beng Hock mendakwa pentadbiran Najib seolah-olah “memperkudakan” mereka dengan tidak mengambil tindakan ke atas tiga pegawai Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) meskipun siasatan suruhanjaya diraja mendapati mereka telah menyumbang kepada kematian bekas setiausaha politik itu dua tahun lalu.
Menurut keluarga itu, ketiadaan tindakan susulan di pihak kerajaan menimbulkan keraguan yang serius, bukan sahaja ke atas suruhanjaya diraja malah hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan Tan Sri Datuk Seri James Foong Cheng Yuen yang telah bertindak sebagai pengerusinya.
“Apa yang kami tidak faham sehingga sekarang ialah mengapa kerajaan masih beranggapan bahawa laporan suruhanjaya diraja tidak membawa bukti yang secukupnya untuk memulakan tindakan ke atas pegawai-pegawai yang menyalahgunakan kuasa mereka, sebaliknya telah menghabiskan begitu banyak wang awam untuk mengadakan satu lagi pusingan siasatan?” soal keluarga itu dalam satu kenyataan yang diemelkan kepada The Malaysian Insider.
“Maka, kami ingin tahu, atas asas apa, kami, keluarga si mati yang sedang sedih, diminta menerima penemuan-penemuan yang dinyatakan dalam laporan suruhanjaya, bahawa Beng Hock mati kerana tindakan membunuh diri akibat (tindakan) paksaan?” soal keluarga itu.
Keluarga itu mengulas kenyataan Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz di Dewan Rakyat Isnin lalu bahawa kerajaan tidak akan mengenakan tindakan pendakwaan ke atas tiga pegawai SPRM meskipun mereka dinamakan dalam laporan yang dikeluarkan tiga bulan lalu sebab tiada sesiapa pun membuat laporan agar dibuat sedemikian.
Kata keluarga itu, mereka ragu-ragu dan sangsi dengan sikap kerajaan dan laporan suruhanjaya itu dan dengan perkembangan hanya membiarkan SPRM mengetuai satu lagi siasatan mereka sendiri ke atas pegawai-pegawainya.
Mereka menekankan bahawa ketiga-tiga pegawai berkenaan telah menggunakan tindakan yang tidak sewajarnya untuk mendapatkan maklumat daripada Beng Hock, yang merupakan satu-satunya saksi ketika siasatan dikendalikan di bangunan Plaza Masalam di Shah Alam — premis mendiang ditemui mati.
Read more
KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 27 — Teoh Beng Hock’s family accused the Najib administration of “taking grieving family members for a ride” by not pushing for criminal charges against three national graftbusters despite a royal investigation panel finding the trio contributed to the political aide’s death two years ago.
The Teohs said the government’s inaction casts serious doubt not only on the credibility of the Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) the prime minister foisted on the family, but its chairman, Federal Court judge Tan Sri Datuk Seri James Foong Cheng Yuen.
“What we do not understand is until today, why the government still thinks the RCI report does not carry enough evidence for commencing action against these officers who have abused their power, but spends more public funds to conduct another round of investigation?” the dead DAP aide’s family questioned in an email statement toThe Malaysian Insider.
“We want to know then, on what basis that we, the grieving family members of the deceased, were asked to accept the findings stated in the RCI report, that Beng Hock died of forced suicide?” they asked.
The still-grieving family was responding to de facto law minister Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz’s statement three days ago that the government would not be prosecuting the three officers from the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) despite being named in the RCI report released three months ago because no one had filed a police report to do so.
The Teohs said they found it incredulous the government remained suspicious and sceptical of the RCI report and left it to the MACC to head another “special task force investigating their own officers”.
They pointed out the RCI had incriminated the MACC trio in its report for using inappropriate violence to draw information out of Beng Hock who was only a witness.
The family further noted the RCI had named the MACC men as investigation officer Mohd Anuar Isamil (“the bully”); assistant investigation officer Mohd Ashraf Mohd Yunus (“the abuser”); and former deputy director of its Selangor branch Hishammuddin Hashim (“the arrogant leader”).
“If Nazri himself does not accept the findings of this report, why are we requested to accept the conclusion of this report then?
“Why impose such soul-destroying double standards upon us? Why the government can choose not to believe but we are not allowed to refute the conclusion of that report?” the family said.
“If this is really being played out, isn’t then the creation of the RCI merely a waste of time and public funds as well as taking the grieving family members for a ride?” they added.
Beng Hock was political secretary to Seri Kembangan assemblyman Ean Yong Hian Wah, and he was found dead on July 16, 2009 on the fifth-floor external corridor of Selangor MACC’s office in Shah Alam after a marathon questioning overnight.
The government set up the RCI in January this year after the coroner delivered an “open verdict” ruling out both suicide and homicide.
The royal panel found that Teoh had been driven to suicide after harsh, relentless questioning by MACC officers.
But while the RCI was in session, a second person fell to his death while under the MACC’s care.
Senior Customs officer Ahmad Sarbaini Mohamed was found dead on a badminton court on the first floor of the MACC building in Cheras on April 6, after purportedly returning to amend his previous testimony as a witness.
Source: Malaysian Insider
KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 25 — Lim Kit Siang called today for the Attorney-General to prosecute “the pack of liars” linked to Teoh Beng Hock’s death.
A fatal plunge ended the life of the former DAP aide at the premises of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) over two years ago.
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz told Parliament yesterday that no legal action would be taken against the anti-graft officers who drove Teoh Beng Hock to suicide as no police report has been lodged over the matter.
But the DAP parliamentary leader said in a statement today that de facto law minister had given a “very lame excuse” as the royal commission of inquiry (RCI) on Teoh’s death offered “sufficient reasons… to bring to book Beng Hock’s killers.”
Lim (picture) pointed out that the RCI was “most scathing in its indictment of the character and testimony of the MACC officers… apart from two brave and truthful souls, the RCI virtually dismissed the rest as a pack of liars led by Hishamuddin Hashim, the “mastermind” of the massive and unjustified operation which resulted in Teoh’s death.”
“In fact, the report is a fertile source for multiple perjury charges against Hishamuddin and other MACC officers in giving false testimony at the RCI,” he said, referring to the offence under Section 193 of the Penal Code that provides for a maximum sentence of seven years jail and fine on conviction.
The Ipoh Timor MP said A-G Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail should “direct a police report be lodged on Teoh Beng Hock’s death based on the findings and new leads in the RCI… and vigourous prosecution pursued (to ensure) no cover-up.”
Teoh, political aide to Seri Kembangan assemblyman Ean Yong Hian Wah, was found dead on July 16, 2009 on the fifth-floor corridor of Selangor MACC’s office in Shah Alam after overnight questioning.
The government formed a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) into his death early this year after the coroner delivered an “open verdict” ruling out both suicide and homicide.
The royal panel found that Teoh had been driven to suicide after harsh, relentless questioning from MACC officers.
But while the RCI was in session, a second person fell to his death while under the MACC’s care.
Senior Customs officer Ahmad Sarbaini Mohamed was found dead on a badminton court on the first floor of the MACC building in Cheras on April 6, after purportedly returning to amend his previous testimony as a witness.
Source: Malaysian Insider
SHAH ALAM, Sept 22 — The Attorney-General’s Chambers have withdrawn an application for a revision of the open verdict that was returned in the inquest into Teoh Beng Hock’s death, Star Online reported today.
The application was made by DPP Manoj Kurup when the matter came up for case management.
It was filed before the Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) into Teoh’s death had been established, and therefore, was no longer required as the commission had delivered its findings, he was quoted as saying.
The application was then struck off by Senior Assistant Registrar Khairul Nizam Abu Bakar.
On July 21, the RCI had stated in its report that Teoh was driven to suicide after being subject to aggressive and relentless interrogation by three MACC officers.
The Teoh family’s lawyer Gobind Singh Deo, however, has said that the revision application still stands as they had filed a written submission during the last mention date and had brought the matter to the court’s notice.
The court had fixed October 6 as the date for case management to decide the application’s status.
Teoh’s body was found on an exterior landing of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam, the MACC’s headquarters at the time, the day after he was interrogated overnight on July 16, 2009.
Coroner Azmil Muntapha Abas had returned an open verdict when the inquest into his death concluded on January 5, ruling that Teoh’s death was neither a suicide nor a homicide.
Source: Malaysian Insider
4 August 2011 – 01:40pm
KUALA LUMPUR (Aug 4, 2011): The decision on the inquest into the death of former Selangor Customs assistant director Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed is set for Sept 26.
Coroner Aizatul Akmal Maharani adjourned the inquest today, setting Aug 25 as the deadline for submission by counsel.
The inquest concludes after hearing the testimony of 34 witnesses on the events leading up to the death of Sarbani, who was found dead on the first floor badminton court of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) office at Jalan Cochrane here on April 6.
He had been called in by MACC for its investigations into corruption cases involving Customs officers.
Witnesses including Sarbani’s family, forensic experts, MACC officers and the police, testified over 13 days of hearings.
The inquest began on July 4, and took a month to conclude.
Earlier, Chemist Department DNA Crime Unit head Dr Seah Lay Hong told the Coroner’s Court that she had found two unknown DNA samples in the DNA swabs of Sarbani’s clothes and body that were presented to her on April 11.
The swabs were from the back of Sarbani’s shirt and pants, and the back of his hands.
“I also received DNA samples from five MACC officers for comparison. All five officers were excluded as contributors for the two foreign DNA,” she said when questioned by DPP Hanim Rashid.
“Contributory sources are deduced to be from two bodies autopsied on the same post-mortem table on April 5 and 6, contamination from possible leftover DNA material from incomplete sterilisation and decontamination of post-mortem table,” she said.
Investigating officer ASP Zuhairi Mohamad said his investigations into Sarbani’s death was only done to 90% satisfaction.
“The remaining 10% is because I never knew why Sarbani had climbed out of the window in the first place,” said Zuhairi.
Two forensic pathologists who testified previously concluded the incident as “accidental death due to fall from height”, and that Sarbani had climbed out the window, but slipped and fell when he attempted to walk sideways along the third floor window’s lower outer ledge.
Zuhairi earlier told MACC lawyer Datuk Seri Muhamad Shafee Abdullah that allegations in a recent blog post on the manner of Sarbani’s death was “pure nonsense.”
“With due respect, myself and DSP Sapii Ahmad were the investigating officers, not the (blogger). His allegations are only his own guesswork.”
Sarbani’s widow had last month lodged a report requesting the police look into these allegations.
The blog post, written by controversial blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin, claimed Sarbani was forced to climb out of the window to “reflect on his mistakes” by the MACC officers, thus leading to his death.
Zuhairi said, in all the 57 statements recorded during investigation, not a single one had the slightest similarity with the blogger’s allegations.
He too, concluded that Sarbani had died accidentally from a fall, ruling out both suicide and homicide.
Source : The Sun
13 September 2011 – 05:25am
S.Tamarai Chelvi
KUALA LUMPUR (Sept 12, 2011): There is an element of “foul play” by Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission (MACC), where its negligence caused the death of Customs Assistant Director Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed, the Coroner’s Court was told today.
Lawyer Awtar Singh, who was holding watching brief for Sarbani’s family, submitted that the investigations into Sarbani’s death was not complete or comprehensive, leaving many unanswered questions.
“Parties are still asking – what is the reason Sarbaini came out of the pantry window? The evidence clearly shows that Sarbani did not commit suicide, was not murdered and (it was) not an accident,” stated Awtar in his 19-page submission sent to the coroner on Aug 25.
“There is no reason for Sarbani to come out through the window to get out of the MACC building as Sarbani was only a visitor and he could go back home at anytime,” stated Awtar.
He also submitted that there were a lot of holes in the investigation into Sarbani’s death.
Sarbani, 56, who was attached to the Port Klang Customs office, was found dead at the badminton court on the first floor of the MACC building in Jalan Cochrane here on April 6.
He was reported to have gone to the commission’s office to meet the investigation officer assigned to corruption cases involving 62 customs officers. Police classified the case as a sudden death and an inquest was ordered.
The month-long inquest, which began on July 4, saw 34 witnesses testify.
Coroner Aizatul Akmal Maharani, who had previously set Sept 26 to deliver the decision, and asked lawyers for Sarbani’s family and the MACC to provide written submissions to the court by Aug 25.
Yesterday was set for clarification of the submissions.
MACC lawyer Datuk Seri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, in his submission, stated that the “verdict should be accidental death.”
“The absence of DNA evidence connecting any MACC officers to Sarbani’s death and the absence of defensive wounds on him clearly indicated that no MACC officers are criminally concerned with regards to the deceased’s death,” stated Shafee in his 112-page written submission sent to the coroner on Aug 25.
He said there is no an iota of evidence to suggest that the deceased’s death is a cause of homicide or that there was a third party involvement, as alleged by counsel for the family.
“There is also not a shred of proof that the deceased had been physically abused or mistreated during his detention by the MACC, during the recording of his subsequent statement on April 4, 2011 or on the day of his death, April 6.”
He said that it is an improbable suggestion that the MACC had caused the death of the deceased. On the other hand, Shafee said there is ample evidence to show that Sarbani had on his own volition got out of the pantry window.
He pointed out that the forensic pathology evidence indicates that the condition of the pantry did not suggest that there was a struggle, and that all injuries sustained by the deceased is consistent with a fall from height.
“The DNA analysis indicates that there are no third party involvement with Sarbani’s death,” stated Shafee.
“It must also be noted that the MACC had no reason to be angry or frustrated with the fact that the deceased had intended to change his statement on April 6 (the day he died),” said Shafee.
Source : The Sun
‘Reading the RCI report made me felt like I’m reading fiction rather than a fact-finding report of a royal commission.’
TBH ‘suicide’ finding: Impossible does not happen
Danny Lazaroo: I’m a practising psychologist, fully registered with the Australian Psychology Board.
I can’t think of any trained and qualified psychologist who would condone or agree with the RCI’s (royal commission of inquiry’s) findings. Suicide, in the absence of prior suicidal attempts or ideation, or psychiatric condition/history, and in a context of an individual with a future orientation, is most unlikely.
But I am not surprised – psychology and psychiatry are not well-regulated mental health fields in Malaysia. Furthermore, it is impossible for any psychiatrist to state with certainty that Teoh Beng Hock would have committed suicide – an actual risk assessment cannot be concluded without prior interview with Teoh or data collected from him.
The best we can come up with is a possibility/probability of suicide. From the start, I’ve believed that this was not, and could not have been, a suicide.
The murderers will continue to be allowed to roam free, of course. This is Malaysia, where the truth is hidden and the illegal always allowed. Malaysia, truly corrupt.
Read more
Teoh Beng Hock’s family today filed an application for a judicial review to set aside the royal commission of inquiry (RCI) finding that the political aide had committed suicide.
The application which was filed by Beng Hock’s brother Teoh Meng Kee at the Kuala Lumpur High Court today named the RCI commissioners – James Foong, Abdul Kadir Sulaiman, T Selventhiranathan, Dr Bhupinder Singh and Dr Mohamed Hatta Shaharom – as respondents.
“After reading the report I would like to clearly state what happened to Teoh Beng Hock from 3.30am to 7am on July 16, 2009, is not known to the respondents,” said Meng Kee in the application.
In the RCI report released last month, the commission postulated that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) had instituted a “fourth interrogation” on Beng Hock during the wee hours while he was in custody.
The commission concluded that it was during that period that Beng Hock was pushed to the brink and eventually committed suicide.
“As advised by my counsel, I believe that a decision and/or an opinion and/or a finding of suicide cannot be made based on assumptions. It must be supported with evidence,” stated Meng Kee.
He was accompanied by his family members and lawyers Karpal Singh and Gobind Singh Deo when he met reporters at the lobby of the Kuala Lumpur Court Complex in Jalan Duta.
Read more
KUALA LUMPUR, 24 Ogos — Keluarga Teoh Beng Hock hari ini memfailkan permohonan semakan kehakiman berhubung penemuan suruhanjaya diraja mengenai kematian bekas setiausaha politik Exco Kerajaan Negeri Selangor itu dua tahun lalu.
Peguam keluarga mendiang Gobind Singh Deo berkata tiada keterangan apa yang berlaku ke atas Teoh antara pukul 3.30 pagi dan 7 pagi, 16 Julai 2009 sebelum Teoh ditemui mati di Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam.
“Jika anda tidak pasti apa yang berlaku, bagaimana anda boleh membuat penemuan ini?” kata Gobind pada sidang media selepas memfailkan permohonan di Mahkamah Tinggi di sini pagi ini.
Dalam laporan yang dikeluarkan akhir bulan lalu, suruhanjaya memutuskan bahawa kematian Teoh dikenal pasti berpunca daripada tindakan membunuh diri.
Keputusan mengenai punca kematian Teoh itu terkandung dalam laporan setebal 124 muka surat.Teoh, 30, Setiausaha Politik kepada EXCO Selangor, Ean Yong Hian Wah, ditemui mati di koridor tingkat lima Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam, Selangor pada 16 Julai 2009 selepas memberi keterangan di pejabat Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) Selangor yang terletak di tingkat 14, plaza berkenaan.
Satu salinan permohonan semakan kehakiman yang dibekalkan kepada media memetik suruhanjaya diraja itu berkata, “kami percaya sesuatu telah berlaku antara pukul 3.30 pagi (selepas kenyataan Teoh dirakamkan oleh SPRM) dan 7 pagi (jangkaan waktu paling awal kematiannya) pada 16 Julai 2009, yang membawa kepada Teoh Beng Hock untuk membunuh diri.”
Keluarga Teoh berkata adalah jelas suruhanjaya diraja tidak tahu apa yang telah berlaku ke atas Teoh ketika itu, sebelum mendiang ditemui mati.
Gobind juga mempersoalkan ketiadaan tindakan yang secukupnya ke atas pegawai-pegawai SPRM, yang menurut suruhanjaya diraja telah mengakibatkan tekanan sehingga membawa kepada tindakan membunuh diri.
“Peguam Negara perlu menjelaskan. Beliau perlu memberitahu kita mengapa tiada tindakan diambil,” kata peguam.
SPRM telah menggantung tugas tiga pegawai sementara siasatan dalaman dijalankan.
Gobind menambah, keluarga Teoh akan memfailkan saman sivil ke atas SPRM bulan depan.
Source: Malaysian Insider
KUALA LUMPUR, 24 Ogos — Keluarga Teoh Beng Hock hari ini memfailkan permohonan semakan kehakiman berhubung penemuan suruhanjaya diraja mengenai kematian bekas setiausaha politik Exco Kerajaan Negeri Selangor itu dua tahun lalu.Peguam keluarga mendiang Gobind Singh Deo berkata tiada keterangan apa yang berlaku ke atas Teoh antara pukul 3.30 pagi dan 7 pagi, 16 Julai 2009 sebelum Teoh ditemui mati di Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam.
“Jika anda tidak pasti apa yang berlaku, bagaimana anda boleh membuat penemuan ini?” kata Gobind pada sidang media selepas memfailkan permohonan di Mahkamah Tinggi di sini pagi ini.
Dalam laporan yang dikeluarkan akhir bulan lalu, suruhanjaya memutuskan bahawa kematian Teoh dikenal pasti berpunca daripada tindakan membunuh diri.
Keputusan mengenai punca kematian Teoh itu terkandung dalam laporan setebal 124 muka surat.Teoh, 30, Setiausaha Politik kepada EXCO Selangor, Ean Yong Hian Wah, ditemui mati di koridor tingkat lima Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam, Selangor pada 16 Julai 2009 selepas memberi keterangan di pejabat Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) Selangor yang terletak di tingkat 14, plaza berkenaan.
Satu salinan permohonan semakan kehakiman yang dibekalkan kepada media memetik suruhanjaya diraja itu berkata, “kami percaya sesuatu telah berlaku antara pukul 3.30 pagi (selepas kenyataan Teoh dirakamkan oleh SPRM) dan 7 pagi (jangkaan waktu paling awal kematiannya) pada 16 Julai 2009, yang membawa kepada Teoh Beng Hock untuk membunuh diri.”
Keluarga Teoh berkata adalah jelas suruhanjaya diraja tidak tahu apa yang telah berlaku ke atas Teoh ketika itu, sebelum mendiang ditemui mati.
Gobind juga mempersoalkan ketiadaan tindakan yang secukupnya ke atas pegawai-pegawai SPRM, yang menurut suruhanjaya diraja telah mengakibatkan tekanan sehingga membawa kepada tindakan membunuh diri.
“Peguam Negara perlu menjelaskan. Beliau perlu memberitahu kita mengapa tiada tindakan diambil,” kata peguam.
SPRM telah menggantung tugas tiga pegawai sementara siasatan dalaman dijalankan.
Gobind menambah, keluarga Teoh akan memfailkan saman sivil ke atas SPRM bulan depan.
|
Recent Activities
-
Candle light vigil for Beng Hock & EO6
Do you accept the result of the RCI finding or u think this is not the real answer? Or you feel the detention of Eo6 are unreasonable? Join us to show support and pressure the government to release and find the truth and give punishment to those who cause th die of Teoh Beng Hock. (…)
-
Launch of Royal Commission Watch Website
Date : 14 Mac 2011 (Mon), Time : 11:00pm, Venue : Ground floor meeting room, KL & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall Malaysians for Beng Hock movement will launch the royal commission watch website to closely monitor the performance of Teoh Beng Hock royal commission of inquiry. (…)
-
“Taiwan experience:political death & transitional justice”movie screening
Date : 28 Feb 2011, Time : 7:30pm, Venue : KL & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall. Details.
Video |
Teoh RCI report continues to rankle
‘Reading the RCI report made me felt like I’m reading fiction rather than a fact-finding report of a royal commission.’
TBH ‘suicide’ finding: Impossible does not happen
Danny Lazaroo: I’m a practising psychologist, fully registered with the Australian Psychology Board.
I can’t think of any trained and qualified psychologist who would condone or agree with the RCI’s (royal commission of inquiry’s) findings. Suicide, in the absence of prior suicidal attempts or ideation, or psychiatric condition/history, and in a context of an individual with a future orientation, is most unlikely.
But I am not surprised – psychology and psychiatry are not well-regulated mental health fields in Malaysia. Furthermore, it is impossible for any psychiatrist to state with certainty that Teoh Beng Hock would have committed suicide – an actual risk assessment cannot be concluded without prior interview with Teoh or data collected from him.
The best we can come up with is a possibility/probability of suicide. From the start, I’ve believed that this was not, and could not have been, a suicide.
The murderers will continue to be allowed to roam free, of course. This is Malaysia, where the truth is hidden and the illegal always allowed. Malaysia, truly corrupt.
Read more